Why people can build their own houses
Zhao Jianhua
by the inherent causes of high prices and direct criticism, to appeal to the people should have the right to build their own houses, is a shift, but also a deepened. Because it involve not only about the current All system information, namely some of the legislative principle involved. because if the individual is free to allow residents to build houses, you must first allow the private sector to lease, purchase, transfer, trading land, or to own land. and this involves the State all the problems of land resources. As long as individuals can not prove that all land will not destroy the basic principles of socialism, the people will not be able to build their own houses. This is not the last one around the bucket.
should first be noted that full production run of all this economic m social forms, not our invention, nor the formation of natural development of human society, but Marx invented the concept, practice and so we artificially created. Marx invented this reason a concept, designed to make the majority of working people out of poverty, out of the social status of slavery to become masters of society and live a free, equal and prosperous life. at the time of Marx, the production of the whole people will so that all citizens are in the same social status, they would all become masters of society, in order to achieve the ideal of one world. In other words, in Marx's sense, the production of the whole people, for people are the masters services, is his vision for the way to achieve this ideal society, not necessarily in the form of the ideal society. because this is a vision, without a practice test. Marx did not foresee and can not foresee the means of production the whole people, can cause slow or even stagnant economic development, and ultimately not only the public really does not make people out of poverty, but there is so that the risk of long-term sustainability of poverty. This is not the reality, it is impossible to Marx want to see.
It is in this context, we started the reform of economic system and began to give up more and more areas of the economy of production by the whole people of the economic model. And it changed the economic model in the following We started the rapid economic development, which Marx began to really want to achieve an ideal society forward. That is, only this time, we may truly understand: production of the whole people, is envisaged to reach the people of Marxist ownership as a way of this ideal, not the basic characteristics of socialism; basic meaning of socialism is the people are the masters, the people living in the freedom, equality and prosperity. In the past the understanding of Marx and light weight form content, even in lieu of content, the form of lost content, is a fundamental misunderstanding of the typical form and dogmatism.
in real life, the form of production brought the whole people in fact, dominated by the Government of production and disposal of resources by the government to bring the power of corruption, such as the Government in the process of land transactions in the profit problems, and Marx on the whole people because of production and the benefits are certainly bound to enjoyed all the people the fundamental departure from the idea. And, this is the people's power, in which the pursuit of interests in danger of being distorted. All these are beyond the pre-Marxist thought are with his mind fundamental departure from socialism.
when we understand the core concepts of socialism and the common prosperity for the people are the masters, when we abandon hopes of finding out the real nature of dogma, we are facing in the reform of many specious, Fuzzy chaos will suddenly become clear the confusion. specific to house problem, since the people the masters of society, is the boss of your life, what have reason to prohibit the owner to have their own land and not allowed to cover the land in their own house? basic necessities of life is the basic content of people's lives, while the land is the basic guarantee of people's lives, if even the basic rights have been denied, but what about the people's master status? the former Soviet Union to spread misunderstanding of Marx, so we go decades of detours and paid a terrible price, we also misunderstand the time of Marx?
addition, also in people's consciousness of a common misunderstanding, or a blind spot. that people always m not recognize the government's economic plan in the past and present what the fundamental difference between the market economy, the so-called social transformation did not find out exactly how one thing; the so-called transition from what type to which type of change, fundamental change before and after What difference?
For us Chinese, the traditional mode of operation is a family we are all very familiar with the mode of operation. a few extended family in the world, is a production, management, accounting economic unit. property is family, of course, each member has one; but the actual decision-making, control, distribution of power is in the The success of the family, but not directly reflected in the distribution of each specific interests. this traditional family business continued to boom down hard, so there will be separation of one said. separation of the children of operating independently, self- , with the benefits and risks. by a superficial point of view, the in economic activities will find the role, subject changed from operating activities (from ; can dominate the resources), management of the main rules of the game followed by changing the (operational effectiveness and personal interests are directly related), in other words, the game itself are all changed: from ; descendants transition is from the the current so that to the people, change and new games are not appropriate to the legal system, allowing people to build their own houses, the content is a necessary social transformation is the process of successful transformation of a key step in a substantive sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment